Descriptive research is one of the key tools needed in any psychology researcher’s toolbox in order to create and lead a project that is both equitable and effective. Because psychology, as a field, loves definitions, let’s start with one. The University of Minnesota’s Introduction to Psychology defines this type of research as one that is “…designed to provide a snapshot of the current state of affairs.”1
That’s pretty broad, so what does that mean in practice? Dr. Heather Derry-Vick (PhD), an assistant professor in psychiatry at Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine, helps us put it into perspective.
“Descriptive research really focuses on defining, understanding, and measuring a phenomenon or an experience,” she says. “Not trying to change a person’s experience or outcome, or even really looking at the mechanisms for why that might be happening, but more so describing an experience or a process as it unfolds naturally.”
Types of Descriptive Research and the Methods Used
Within the descriptive research methodology there are multiple types, including the following.
Descriptive Survey Research
This involves going beyond a typical tool like a LIkert Scale—where you typically place your response to a prompt on a one to five scale. We already know that scales like this can be ineffective, particularly when studying pain, for example.
When that’s the case, using a descriptive methodology can help dig deeper into how a person is thinking, feeling, and acting rather than simply quantifying it in a way that might be unclear or confusing.
Descriptive Observational Research
Think of observational research like an ethically-focused version of people-watching. One example would be watching the patterns of children on a playground—perhaps when looking at a concept like risky play or seeking to observe social behaviors between children of different ages.
Descriptive Case Study Research
A descriptive approach to a case study is akin to a biography of a person, honing in on the experiences of a small group to extrapolate to larger themes. We most commonly see descriptive case studies when those in the psychology field are using past clients as an example to illustrate a point.
Correlational Descriptive Research
While descriptive research is often about the here and now, this form of the methodology allows researchers to make connections between groups of people. As an example from her research, Derry-Vick says she uses this method to identify how gender might play a role in cancer scan anxiety, aka scanxiety.
Dr. Derry-Vick’s research uses surveys and interviews to get a sense of how cancer patients are feeling and what they are experiencing both in the course of their treatment and in the lead-up to their next scan, which can be a significant source of stress.
David Marlon, PsyD, MBA, who works as a clinician and as CEO at Vegas Stronger, and whose research focused on leadership styles at community-based clinics, says that using descriptive research allowed him to get beyond the numbers.
In his case, that includes data points like how many unhoused people found stable housing over a certain period or how many people became drug-free—and identify the reasons for those changes.
Those [data points] are some practical, quantitative tools that are helpful. But when I question them on how safe they feel, when I question them on the depth of the bond or the therapeutic alliance, when I talk to them about their processing of traumas, wellbeing…these are things that don’t really fall on to a yes, no, or even on a Likert scale.
For the portion of his thesis that was focused on descriptive research, Marlon used semi-structured interviews to look at the how and the why of transformational leadership and its impact on clinics’ clients and staff.
Advantages & Limitations of Descriptive Research
So, if the advantages of using descriptive research include that it centers the research participants, gives us a clear picture of what is happening to a person in a particular moment, and gives us very nuanced insights into how a particular situation is being perceived by the very person affected, are there drawbacks?
Yes, there are. Dr. Derry-Vick says that it’s important to keep in mind that just because descriptive research tells us something is happening doesn’t mean it necessarily leads us to the resolution of a given problem.
I think that, by design, the descriptive research might not tell you why a phenomenon is happening. So it might tell you, very well, how often it’s happening, or what the levels are, or help you understand it in depth. But that may or may not always tell you information about the causes or mechanisms for why something is happening.
Another limitation she identifies is that it also can’t tell you, on its own, whether a particular treatment pathway is having the desired effect.
“Descriptive research in and of itself can’t really tell you whether a specific approach is going to be helpful until you take in a different approach to actually test it.”
Marlon, who believes in a multi-disciplinary approach, says that his subfield—addictions—is one where descriptive research had its limits, but helps readers go beyond preconceived notions of what addictions treatment looks and feels like when it is effective.
“If we talked to and interviewed and got descriptive information from the clinicians and the clients, a much more precise picture would be painted, showing the need for a client’s specific multidisciplinary approach augmented with a variety of modalities,” he says. “If you tried to look at my discipline in a pure quantitative approach, it wouldn’t begin to tell the real story.”
Best Practices for Conducting Descriptive Research
Because you’re controlling far fewer variables than other forms of research, it’s important to identify whether those you are describing, your study participants, should be informed that they are part of a study.
For example, if you’re observing and describing who is buying what in a grocery store to identify patterns, then you might not need to identify yourself.
However, if you’re asking people about their fear of certain treatment, or how their marginalized identities impact their mental health in a particular way, there is far more of a pressure to think deeply about how you, as the researcher, are connected to the people you are researching.
Many descriptive research projects use interviews as a form of research gathering and, as a result, descriptive research that is focused on this type of data gathering also has ethical and practical concerns attached. Thankfully, there are plenty of guides from established researchers about how to best conduct these interviews and/or formulate surveys.